Firmament: what was it?

The only reasons the vapor canopy theory got any traction, were the many references to something like it in ancient tales of creation. Isaac Newton Vail tried to sell it to Christians the same way. Specifically he tried to make his vapor canopy sound like the “firmament” in Genesis chapter 1. (Or rather, one of the firmaments; more on that below.) But as Walter T. Brown and Bob Enyart separately say, Vail got it wrong. Because someone else, who should have known better, translated it wrong.

Where did the word “firmament” come from?

The site BibleHub.com lists nineteen versions of the Bible in English. Of these, eight, or almost half, use the word firmament in Genesis 1:6. The NIV calls it a vault, the ISV calls it a canopy (ironic, that), and the NASB and six other versions call it an expanse. Two more versions call it space and horizon, respectively.

St. Jerome chose "firmament" to translate "raqia." It was a mistake.

Jerome of Illyria, writing in an ancient codex. Artist: Leonello Spada (1576-1622)

The word firmament is a short form of the Latin word firmamentum. Jerome of Illyria chose that word for his Vulgate, the Latin translation of the Bible from the Septuagint, the product of the Great Library of Alexandria. The original Greek word, that the Seventy Translators chose, was stereoma, which means “a solid.”

None of these words do the original Hebrew word justice. The original word is raqia, which means a thin sheet of beaten metal, or anything someone has pounded into shape. This in turn comes from the Hebrew verb raqa. That word describes the pounding-out, or the beating-out, that a metalsmith does to produce that thin sheet. (All these meanings come from Strong’s Complete Dictionary of Bible Words.)

All this is important to deciding exactly how to translate it. Like so many words in any language, the root raqa and the noun raqia can have more than one meaning. But one must choose consistent meanings for words, or their roots, that appear in different places.

The raqia – earth or sky – which is it?

The word raqia appears nine times in Genesis chapter 1. For the first five, it appears with no qualification. But in the other four (beginning at Genesis 1:14), we see the expression raqia hashemayim. Most verses render that “the expanse [or firmament or whatever] of the heavens [or sky].” But then we see Genesis 1:8a, which in the KJV (or “Authorised Version” in England):

And God called the firmament Heaven.

Therein lies the confusion. Ever since Jerome chose to write

vocavitque Deus firmamentum caelum

for

V’iqara Elohim le-raqia shemayim

generations of Christians have gotten this verse wrong. And atheists, too.

Raqia in context

One must study every word in the original Hebrew to work out what raqia means. First, the word shemayim is a “dual” of a word the Bible never uses in the singular. That word is shemah. And that does not necessarily mean the sky. All it means is lofty or aloft. “Lofty” can mean physically high or spiritually high, a place God might go where ordinary beings may not go.

And what does qara mean? It usually means to call out to someone you’ve met. We see it used to call something or someone by name, or to assign a name. But suppose it simply means to proclaim? Then Genesis 1:8a reads in part,

And God proclaimed the raqia a lofty place.

A place where He meant to dwell. (He did dwell in the Garden of Eden, before the Fall of Man.) A place for which God had big plans.

Now we know what raqia does not mean, unless the context says it means it. It does not mean “the expanse of outer space.”

Now turn to Psalm 136:6. Different versions in English render that slightly different ways. But the original Hebrew reads:

Le-raqa ha’aretz ol-hamim

In the NASB that reads “To Him who spread out the earth above the waters.” Spread out? Pounded out. Turned into…a thin beaten sheet. The root verb and noun are too close to read any other way. And what was that thin sheet? Nothing other than the land we call Earth. Or to be more specific, the crust of the earth.

Genesis 1:6 says this pounded-out sheet lay “in the middle of waters” and “separate[d] waters from waters.” It was not any water vapor canopy. Furthermore it separated the shallow bodies of water above the crust from a subcrustal ocean, or “the fountains of the great deep.”

Pastor Bob Enyart of Denver Bible Church (and Real Science Radio) explains it here. He also distinguishes the “sheet of the sky” from plain “sheet.” King David (author of most of the Psalms) described that too: how God “stretched out the lofty places like a tent.” This was the Big Stretch, the real means by which the universe expanded.

Walter T. Brown includes his own word study in his book, In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood.

If only Jerome had chosen a better word from firmamentum or “firmament,” those trying to work out exactly how God created the earth could have saved a lot of time.

Reprinted from examiner.com

Related:

[subscribe2]

5 thoughts on “Firmament: what was it?

  1. How can anyone think they’re better translators who know both Hebrew and English better than the venerable scholars that worked on the committee for the “Authorized” King James Bible? It’s amazing!

    Find John Hinton’s articles on the subject, they’re revealing. Let’s reject these “Hath God said” adulterated milk of the word and trust that God knew what he was doing throughout the ages. He would not leave us today without a trustworthy Bible, i.e. worthy of trust as His Inspired Inerrant Word.

    It’s got to be somewhere, not scattered…

    • I allowed that in the same spirit that I would run an interview and allow responses.

      Just because someone might have a better degree in Scriptural languages than I have, doesn’t mean he’s right and I’m wrong. That’s called argumentum ab auctoritate when you make it, or argumentum a gradis (proof from one’s own degrees or grades) when he makes it. Either way, a logical fallacy as I’m sure you know.

      I would also remind you that King James’ original commission specifically said any improvement over their work would be welcome. If they don’t claim Divine inspiration for their work, I fail to see how any of us, no matter what grades he got or what degrees he has, has any authority to claim such inspiration on their behalf.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.