Creation Day 2: Firmament

On Creation Day 2, God made a “firmament among waters,” to “divide waters from waters.” Where was this? Perhaps not in space, but on earth. But what about the “firmament of the heavens” on Creation Day Four? That was a different firmament.

What is a firmament?

The Hebrew word raqia (רקיע) means a thin sheet, usually of hammered metal. This is the actual word that appears in the account of Creation Day Two (and Day Four). As a metaphor, it stands for a thin sheet that someone shapes and molds. The word firmament, in the Authorized (King James) Version, comes from the Latin word firmamentum. St. Jerome used that word to translate the Greek word stereoma that Ptolemy’s Seventy Translators substituted for the Hebrew raqia. Stereoma connotes firmness or strength. Raqia connotes flexibility and workability. And while the “firmament” of Creation Day Two might be relatively firm, people forget that God worked it to His liking.

The Genesis account mentions raqia prominently in the account of Creation Day Two (Genesis 1:6-8). It mentions that word again at Creation Day Four (Genesis 1:14-19). This time it adds the phrase “of the heavens” or “of the skies,” hence “hammered sheet of the skies” (raqia shemayim). Why add the qualifier on Day Four but not on Day Two? God has one of two reasons for the different use of the word shemayim:

  1. The hammered sheet is always in the sky, and He first uses that word to define something new.
  2. God means to describe two different hammered sheets, one on earth and one in space.

The first choice leads to an obvious problem: why does God speak of separating water from water in the sky? That implies liquid water in outer space. Astronomers have found large amounts of water surrounding far-off objects. But this would imply an unbroken wall or shell of water at the edge of the universe. Astronomers have guessed at such a thing, but no one has found it yet.

Some creation advocates, beginning with Isaac Newton Vail in 1874 and continuing with men like Carl Baugh today, believe that the expanse was a canopy that surrounded the earth’s atmosphere but was several hundreds of miles above and beyond it. Vail and others thought this canopy was filled with water; Baugh thinks it was filled with metallic hydrogen. The physical problems with such a theory are formidable alone. But more to the point, this cannot fit the description of an expanse dividing water from water.

The formation of the earth's crust on Creation Day Two and Three

Diagrams of the earth’s crust as the expanse or “firmament” of the earth, as it existed on Days Two and Three of creation. Figures not drawn to scale. Credit: Walter T. Brown/Center for Scientific Creation

The second choice leads to a slight confusion. Why does God say, “God called the hammered-sheet sky” (Genesis 1:8)? That depends on what He meant by the word sky (shemayim). That could mean either:

  1. Anything that we normally call “sky,” including where the birds fly, and the outer space beyond that, or:
  2. Where God lives.

Walt Brown reminds us that God did live on earth before the Fall of Man. So perhaps God meant to say, “This is where I shall live.”

Two firmaments

So the Bible here describes two different firmaments, or expanses, or “hammered sheets.” One is the “expanse of the sky” that holds the sun, the moon, the stars, and all the planets. The other is on the earth, and a part of it. But what could it be? Brown gives a surprising answer: the earth’s crust.

Creation Day Two and the firmament of the earth

The Bible first mentions “the waters” in Creation Day One. Water was not the one thing that made up the earth. But water covered the earth on Day One. Then, on Day Two, the Bible describes a hammered-sheet-like expanse “in the middle of the waters” and “dividing waters from waters.”

Brown begins his description here, and continues it here. Briefly, the hammered sheet, or expanse, is the original earth’s crust. On this Day it was completely submerged, and also covered about half the water that God gave the earth. This water beneath the crust became the subcrustal ocean that would later, tragically, break out and cause a Flood. The water above the crust continued as the first surface oceans and other bodies of water.

But God was not finished with the crust, when He made it on Day Two. The Creation Day Two account does not say that “God saw that it was good.” This word good (Hebrew tov) here means “finished” and “meeting Divine approval.” So the crust was in place, but the shaping and molding would come later, during Creation Day Three.

Still, “God called the expanse heaven.” Meaning that God said that He would live there, once He finished His work.

Reprinted from Conservative News and Views.

Related:

Creation Day 1: Light

5 thoughts on “Creation Day 2: Firmament

  1. Pingback: Creation Day 2: Fire in Water - Creation Science Hall of Fame

  2. I ascribe to Dr Walt Brown’s Hydroplate Theory. By the grace of God I have been able to translate the Genesis chapters 1 to 11 Hebrew Text. I did it so that I could hold up Creation Science material up to its light. [If you are a house wife & you are trying to sort out all the various theories out there that brainy people are tossing around, the Hebrew text is your only safe haven/recourse.] I have found that the Hebrew text confirms the Hydroplate Theory in chapters 1 & 2 and in chapters 6 through 11. Nevertheless, his explanation of Raqia (meaning the crust of the earth) & Shamiyim are taken out of context with the Hebrew text, even though the literal translations of the words are correct. The way the Hebrew works in Genesis is that each paragraph begins with a statement (like the engine of a train) and then all the rest of the ‘paragraph’ is hooked on to that ‘engine’ with the Hebrew letter ‘vav’ (waw). ‘Vav’ means ‘and’. A Hebrew paragraph begins with a statement (the train engine) and then all the sentences about that statement begin with ‘and’/’vav’ (the freight cars). The first paragraph in Genesis begins with Genesis 1:1 and finishes with Genesis 2:3. (Genesis 2:4 begins the next paragraph.) Anything concerning the Shamiyim has to agree with what verse one says about the Shamiyim/2Heavens. So Dr Walt Browns interpretation doesn’t work.

    The way that the Hydroplate theory fits the Hebrew Text is that the Hebrew Text says that there are 2 separate bodies of water on the earth at the time of Creation.

    • I have spent the last several mitenus browsing this site and reading some of your entries. I now sit here, caught up in the precious memories of the days we camped and traveled with our sons. You have voiced in your blogs the exact things we tried to instill in our children good family times that are wrapped around God’s creations, God’s beliefs, and God’s unending love. Thanks for sharing this with me. It would be an honor to share it with my friends. And even though we don’t have children in our home now, my husband and I plan on following your comments each week. I am excited about all the treasures we will be storing up for our first grandchild who is on the way. Thank you for blessing my day.

  3. Pingback: Creation Day 3: Dry Land - Creation Science Hall of Fame

  4. Pingback: Pre-Flood water cycle and first rains - Creation Science Hall of Fame

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.